James Blair-Bey v. Samuel A. Lewis, Director, Department of Corrections Alexander, Sgt., Personal Property Room D'addablo, Property Room, Does Unknown

37 F.3d 1504 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. James BLAIR-BEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Samuel A. LEWIS, Director, Department of Corrections; Alexander, Sgt., Personal Property Room; D'Addablo, Property Room, Does Unknown, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15590. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 14, 1994. * Decided Sept. 19, 1994. Before: BROWNING, WRIGHT, and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 James Blair-Bey appeals pro se a summary judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 claim. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and review de novo the grant of summary judgment. Fu-Kong Tzung v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co., 873 F.2d 1338, 1339-40 (9th Cir.1989). 1 We affirm. His Fourth Amendment rights were not violated when prison officials limited his access to his personal property. Otherwise he raised no genuine issue of material fact. 2 3 Blair-Bey is in the custody of the Arizona Department of Corrections. He was…