Erickson v. Midland Mortg. Co.

Good Law
37 F.3d 1504·1994 WL 526962·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 36418
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 28, 199493-35660California326 words

Opinion

Opinion

37 F.3d 1504 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert A. ERICKSON; Carla D. Erickson, Husband & Wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MIDLAND MORTGAGE CO.; 1st United Bank of Sidney; United States of America; Government National Mortgage Association, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-35660. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 16, 1994. * Decided Sept. 28, 1994. 1 Before: BROWNING and CANBY, Circuit Judges, and HUFF ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Plaintiffs appeal the district court's order and judgment of January 28, 1993, granting summary judgment in favor of defendant Government National Mortgage Association ("GNMA"), and the court's order of March 8, 1993, denying their motion to amend the judgment. As the district court correctly noted, Cheryl Van Every was authorized by statute to acknowledge the trust indenture, and the Ericksons failed to present evidence that she was a party to the indenture and, therefore, disqualified from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.