Damian Ignacio Cano v. United States

37 F.3d 1504 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Damian Ignacio CANO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-16761. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 4, 1994. * Decided Oct. 6, 1994. Before: BROWNING, FARRIS and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 The district court granted Damian I. Cano's motion under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 , and ordered the Bureau of Prisons to release Cano from federal prison on August 24, 1993. Cano was released as ordered. Cano appeals the district court decision, however, because he claims the district court did not grant all relief requested and due. Neither party contests the district court's decision that, under the terms of the plea agreement, Cano was entitled to credit for time served from July 15, 1989. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we dismiss the appeal. 3 * On September 5, 1991, Cano pled guilty to conspiring with intent to distribute…