Boecon Corporation v. Catalytic, Inc. And the Ralph M. Parsons Company

37 F.3d 1504 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. BOECON CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CATALYTIC, INC. and the Ralph M. Parsons Company, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-35548. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 4, 1994. Decided Oct. 12, 1994. 1 Before: KOZINSKI and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges and REAL, District Judge. * 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 BOECON CORPORATION (BOECON) in its appeal to this court claims error by the District Court in dismissing its claim for fraud and prejudgment interest and holding that BOECON'S execution of a conditional release precluded an award of damages. BOECON also appeals the District Court's confirmation of a special master's ruling granting the "Special Coatings" claim of appellee Catalytic, Inc. (CATALYTIC). 4 Because this appeal deals with the application of contract claims Inland Empire Builders, 191 Ct.Cl. 742 , 424 F.2d 1370 (1970). There was no error in the rulings on this issue. 5 Finally…