Arturo M. Bowmane v. Ron Angelone Brenda Burns and Ralph Owens

37 F.3d 1504 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Arturo M. BOWMANE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ron ANGELONE; Brenda Burns; and Ralph Owens, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15579. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 20, 1994. * Decided Sept. 27, 1994. Before: SNEED, WIGGINS, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Nevada state prisoner Arturo M. Bowmane appeals pro se the district court's dismissal without prejudice of his action for failure to pay a partial filing fee. Bowmane alleges that the district court's policy of requiring a partial filing fee is an abuse of the court's power under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review the district court's decision to impose a partial filing fee pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915 for an abuse of discretion. Alexander v. Carson Adult High School, 9 F.3d 1448, 1449 (9th Cir.1993). We affirm. 3 Recently, we upheld the Nevada District Court's policy…