Darin Bessett v. Cna American Casualty Ins. Co., a Foreign Corporation

Good Law
37 F.3d 1504·1994 WL 561843·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 36424
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 13, 199493-15665California2,036 words

Opinion

Opinion

37 F.3d 1504 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Darin BESSETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CNA AMERICAN CASUALTY INS. CO., a foreign corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-15665. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 6, 1994. * Decided Oct. 13, 1994. 1 Before: PREGERSON, WIGGINS, Circuit Judges, and FONG, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Darin Bessett sought a declaration of his rights under a homeowner's policy held by his former employer, Elda Reyna. The district court granted summary judgment to defendant American Casualty, finding that three different exclusions in the policy precluded coverage. Bessett appeals, contending that the district court erred in failing to certify a question of law to the Arizona Supreme Court, and in interpreting the homeowner's policy to deny coverage. We affirm. I. Background 4 This case arises out of an accident that occurred on April 4, 1994, rendering Darin Bessett a paraplegic. 5 Darin Bessett and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.