Lattice Semiconductor Corporation v. Interface Electronic Corporation

37 F.3d 1505 1994-2 Trade Cases P 70,779 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. INTERFACE ELECTRONIC CORPORATION, Defendant/Appellant. No. 93-35215. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 14, 1994. Decided Sept. 27, 1994. Before: ALDISERT * , TANG and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 The primary issue for decision in this appeal is whether the district court erred in ordering summary judgment in favor of Lattice Semiconductor Corporation on its action sounding in goods sold and delivered and against Interface Electronic Corporation on its counterclaim alleging price fixing in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. Sec. 1 . We affirm. 3 Jurisdiction was proper in the district court based on 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1332 (a)(1). This court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . The appeal by Interface was timely filed under Rule 4(a) of the Federal Rules of…