Stacy Gilliam v. County of Los Angeles Sherman Block, Sheriff P. Geisler Jerome Russick

37 F.3d 1505 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Stacy GILLIAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; Sherman Block, Sheriff; P. Geisler; Jerome Russick, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-56006. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 3, 1994. Submission Vacated May 26, 1994. Resubmitted July 13, 1994. Decided Oct. 6, 1994. Before: BROWNING, FERGUSON, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Plaintiff-appellant Stacy Gilliam appeals the district court's entry of judgment in favor of all defendants in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. He alleges that County deputy sheriffs violated his Fourth Amendment rights during his arrest on April 23, 1989, and that the County's official municipal policy regarding the training of deputies in the use of police dogs constitutes a violation of his constitutional rights pursuant to Monell v. Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658 (1978). Gilliam also appeals the court's…