Gai v. City of Selma

Good Law
37 F.3d 1505·1994 WL 515323·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 36379
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 19, 199493-15280California611 words

Opinion

Opinion

37 F.3d 1505 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Dennis Z. GAI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SELMA; Robert Kenyon, individually and as a member of the City Council of the City of Selma; John Mechigian, individually and as a member of the City Council of Selma; Calvin Nishinaka, individually and as a member of the personnel Commission of the City of Selma; Larry Fitzpatrick, individually and as a member of the personnel Commission of the City of Selma; David Helm, individually and as a member of the personnel Commission of the City of Selma; Selma City Council; Personnel Commission of the City of Selma, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-15280. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 11, 1994. Decided Sept. 19, 1994. Before: FLETCHER, HALL, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Dennis Gai brought this action in California state court, alleging wrongful termination and denial of due process in the termination procedures, in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.