Jerome Joseph v. Leonard Myers and Joseph Ascencio

37 F.3d 1505 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jerome JOSEPH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Leonard MYERS and Joseph Ascencio, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-16970. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 16, 1994. * Decided Oct. 7, 1994. Before: CHOY, SKOPIL, and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jerome Joseph appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of appellee San Jose police officers, Joseph Ascencio and Leonard Myers, in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. 3 * On September 7, 1988, San Jose Police Officers Asencio and Myers were informed by a member of the Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Office that Jerome Joseph was wanted in Santa Barbara on an outstanding arrest warrant. They also learned that he was wanted on Los Angeles and Ohio arrest warrants. Joseph was apprehended by the officers at 2:30 p.m. later that day and booked into the Santa Clara County Jail to be held pending transfer to Santa Barbara. 4…