Craig Frost v. Federal Aviation Administration National Transportation Safety Board

Good Law
37 F.3d 1505·1994 WL 515357·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 36381
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 21, 199493-70720California959 words

Opinion

Opinion

37 F.3d 1505 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Craig FROST, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION; National Transportation Safety Board, Respondents. No. 93-70720. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 14, 1994. * Decided Sept. 21, 1994. Before: ALDISERT, ** TANG and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM *** 2 Craig Frost petitions for review of the National Transportation Safety Board's (NTSB) denial of his appeal from an administrative law judge's (ALJ) decision upholding the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) suspension and revocation of his commercial pilot certificate. 3 Frost raises three issues in his petition to this court: (1) whether the revocation of his license violates the rule of uniformity announced in Essery v. Department of Transp., 857 F.2d 1286 (9th Cir.1988); (2) whether the ALJ erred in excluding evidence of Frost's ability and qualifications as irrelevant to the issue whether revocation was the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.