Jonathan Lamons v. C.O. Walsh C.O. Bates

37 F.3d 1505 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jonathan LAMONS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. C.O. WALSH; C.O. Bates, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-17339. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 20, 1994. * Decided Sept. 27, 1994. Before: SNEED, WIGGINS, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jonathan Lamons, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for defendants in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. Lamons contends that his constitutional rights were violated when prison officials retaliated against him for filing an inmate grievance by removing him from his prison job and conspiring to place him in segregation. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review de novo, Tipton v. University of Haw., 15 F.3d 922 , 925 (9th Cir.1994), and affirm. 3 Summary judgment is appropriate if the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, shows that no…