Willie R. Finley v. Samuel Lewis

Good Law
37 F.3d 1505·1994 WL 526171·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 36383
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 27, 199494-15654California860 words

Opinion

Opinion

37 F.3d 1505 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Willie R. FINLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Samuel LEWIS; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15654. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 20, 1994. * Decided Sept. 27, 1994. Before: SNEED, WIGGINS, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Arizona state prisoner Willie Ray Finley appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for the prison officials in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. Finley alleged that his due process rights were violated when he was placed in administrative detention. On appeal, Finley alleges that the district improperly failed to consider several post-judgment motions. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. 3 "A grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo to determine, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, whether there exist any genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.