Singleton v. Cheesebrough

37 F.3d 1506 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Stanley Ezell SINGLETON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHEESEBROUGH, Badge # 3282 being sued as individual and as San Diego Police Officer; Kendrick, Badge # 3212 sued as individual and as a San Diego Police Officer, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-55333. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 20, 1994. * Decided Sept. 27, 1994. Before: SNEED, WIGGINS and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Stanley Ezell Singleton, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action in which he alleged that the defendant police officers had violated his fourth and fourteenth amendment rights by detaining him and searching him without reasonable suspicion or probable cause. 3 The appellees contend that Singleton's notice of appeal is untimely pursuant to Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(1) and that this appeal should be dismissed. 4 Generally, an appeal in a civil…