Richardson v. New England Mutual Life Insurance Corporation

Good Law
37 F.3d 1506
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 28, 199493-35609California322 words

Opinion

Opinion

37 F.3d 1506 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Cecilia E. Richardson RICE, Trustee of the Horace D. and Margaret C. Richardson Life Insurance Trust, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW ENGLAND MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION, a Massachusetts corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-35609. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 14, 1994. * Decided Sept. 21, 1994. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing Dec. 28, 1994. Before: BROWNING, WRIGHT, and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 The law of the case doctrine did not foreclose the district court's consideration of Rice's motion because this court's previous order denying Rice's fee petition neither "explicitly [n]or by necessary implication" held that fees generally are not recoverable in this case. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co. v. E.E.O.C., 691 F.2d 438 , 441 (9th Cir.1982). 3 WE may affirm the judgment of the district court on any ground supported by the record. Charley's Taxi Radio Dispatch Corp.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.