Ervin Charles St. Amand v. George Kaiser, Medical Director of Nevada D.O.P. Medical Division, in His Individual and Personal Capacity

Good Law
37 F.3d 1506·1994 WL 526197·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 36361
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 27, 199494-15238California962 words

Opinion

Opinion

37 F.3d 1506 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ervin Charles ST. AMAND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. George KAISER, Medical Director of Nevada D.O.P. Medical Division, in his individual and personal capacity, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-15238. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 20, 1994. * Decided Sept. 27, 1994. Before: SNEED, WIGGINS, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Former Nevada state prisoner Ervin Charles St. Amand appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for defendant Dr. George Kaiser in St. Amand's 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 civil rights action. St. Amand alleged that Dr. Kaiser was deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs by refusing to make timely arrangements for St. Amand to be fitted with a new prothesis for his right leg. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. 3 "A grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo to determine, viewing the evidence in the light most…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.