Ursula Straub v. Robert F. Cary David Paris

37 F.3d 1506 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ursula STRAUB, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert F. CARY; David Paris, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-35199. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 20, 1994. * Decided Sept. 27, 1994. Before: SNEED, WIGGINS, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ursula Straub appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for former Washington State Hospital psychiatrist Robert Cary and psychologist David Paris in Straub's 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. Straub's complaint alleged that her constitutional rights were violated during state criminal proceedings when Dr. Paris provided the court with a false report regarding her mental competency to stand trial. The complaint also alleged that while Straub was committed to the Washington State Hospital for the court ordered evaluation, Straub was told that Dr. Cary would recommend hospitalization for an unlimited time. We have jurisdiction under 28…