Greg Schultz v. United States Parole Commission, United States Probation Office Elizabeth A. Clark and Douglas Curless

37 F.3d 1506 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Greg SCHULTZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, United States Probation Office; Elizabeth A. Clark; and Douglas Curless, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-16849. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 16, 1994. * Decided Oct. 7, 1994. Before: CHOY, SKOPIL, and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Greg Schultz, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the dismissal of his action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). 3 * Schultz filed a complaint seeking injunctive relief and damages on January 3, 1991. On March 4, 1991, he filed a first amended complaint seeking only damages. On May 21, 1991, he filed a second amended complaint against the United States Parole Commission, Elizabeth A. Clark, Douglas Curless, and the United States Probation Office. The district court dismissed the action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies on…