United States v. Fernando Perez Bustillo

37 F.3d 1506 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fernando Perez BUSTILLO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50763. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 5, 1994. * Decided Oct. 14, 1994. 1 Before: D.W. NELSON, NORRIS, and BOGGS ** , Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 In 1991, defendant Fernando Perez Bustillo was convicted of murder, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1111 ; assault with intent to commit murder, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 113 ; assault on a federal corrections officer, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 111 ; and possession of a weapon by a prison inmate, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1791 . Two years later, Bustillo filed a motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence, a motion for discovery, and a motion for the appointment of counsel. He also claimed that his trial counsel's assistance was ineffective. The district court summarily denied the motions. We affirm. 4 *…