Sherman v. Berlin

37 F.3d 1506 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Leonard SHERMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joan D. BERLIN, d/b/a JDB Properties; California Workers' Appeal Board; Casey Young, Dr., California Division of Workers' Compensation; Division of Workers' Compensation, Casey Young, Director; Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-55441. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 4, 1994. * Decided Oct. 6, 1994. Before: BROWNING, FARRIS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Leonard Sherman appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. Sherman contends that the defendants violated his civil rights during proceedings before the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board ("WCAB"). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 Sherman's amended complaint alleged that he had been employed by defendant Joan D. Berlin and had suffered a stress-related job injury…