Skone & Connors Produce, Inc., a Washington Corporation v. John J. Panattoni and Cheryl Panattoni

Good Law
37 F.3d 1506·1994 WL 521146·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 36368
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 22, 199491-36358California904 words

Opinion

Opinion

37 F.3d 1506 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. SKONE & CONNORS PRODUCE, INC., a Washington corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John J. PANATTONI and Cheryl Panattoni, Defendants-Appellants. No. 91-36358. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 14, 1994. * Decided Sept. 22, 1994. Before: BROWNING, WRIGHT and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 John and Cheryl Panattoni argue that the district court erred by holding them personally liable on summary judgment for the debt of their closely held corporation, Fresh Mar, Inc., d/b/a FreshPict Marketing, Inc. (FreshPict). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm. 1 3 When Skone & Connors Produce, Inc. delivered potatoes to FreshPict's client a nonsegregated trust was automatically created under the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act (PACA). 7 U.S.C. Sec. 499e(c)(2); In re San Joaquin Food Service, Inc., 958 F.2d 938, 939 (9th Cir.1992). FreshPict held its…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.