Argentina Del Socorro Raudez-Hurtada v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

37 F.3d 1506 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Argentina Del Socorro RAUDEZ-HURTADA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 93-70771. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 3, 1994. * Decided Oct. 5, 1994. Before: GOODWIN, O'SCANNLAIN and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 We cannot review the facts de novo. The petition must be denied unless "the evidence presented by the applicant would compel any reasonable factfinder to reach a contrary result." Hartooni v. INS, 21 F.3d 336, 340 (9th Cir.1994). In this case, reasonable factfinders could differ, so we must affirm. 3 Ms. Raudez-Hurtada was not threatened with physical harm. She was not fired, or told that she would be fired, from the two jobs from which she resigned. Her situation is distinguishable from that of the petitioner in Kovac v. INS, 407 F.2d 102, 104 (9th Cir.1969), whose employers were directly contacted by the Yugoslavian secret…