United States v. Lemuel Fezell Jackson

Good Law
37 F.3d 1507·1994 WL 526977·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 36327
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 27, 199493-30229California372 words

Opinion

Opinion

37 F.3d 1507 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lemuel Fezell JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-30229. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 12, 1994. Decided Sept. 27, 1994. 1 Appeal from the United States District Court Eastern District of Washington, No. CR-92-00298-FVS; Fred L. Van Sickle, District Judge, Presiding. 2 E.D.Wash. 3 AFFIRMED. 4 BEFORE: BROWNING, WRIGHT and CANBY, Circuit Judges 5 MEMORANDUM * 6 Jackson entered an unconditional guilty plea, the validity of which he does not contest. Accordingly, he has waived his right to raise his Sixth Amendment claim on appeal. See United States v. Carrasco, 786 F.2d 1452, 1453-54 (9th Cir.1986). 1 7 In a different brief, filed in November 1993, Jackson also contends that his sentence for possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute should be overturned because the sentencing guidelines concerning crack cocaine…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.