Valladares v. Superior Court

37 F.3d 1507 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Monica A. VALLADARES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SUPERIOR COURT; Harold T. Alphonse; Santa Clara Land Title Company; Coldwell Banker; Linda Kingsbury; District Attorney Family Support Division; Pedro T. Valladares; Georgina T. Valladares, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15202. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 4, 1994. * Decided Oct. 6, 1994. Before: BROWNING, FARRIS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Monica Valladares ("Valladares") appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of her 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action as time barred. The district court also imposed sanctions pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 11 after determining that Valladares' action was frivolous. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review the district court's dismissal of an action on statute of limitations grounds de novo. Donoghue v. Orange County, 848 F.2d 926, 929 (9th Cir.1987). We…