United States v. Real Property Located at 4274 Alta Vista, Riverside, California, Harry W. Kelley Marguerite L. Sanford, Claimants-Appellants

37 F.3d 1507 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4274 ALTA VISTA, RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA, Defendant, Harry W. KELLEY; Marguerite L. Sanford, Claimants-Appellants. No. 94-55037. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 4, 1994. * Decided Oct. 6, 1994. Before: BROWNING, FARRIS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Harry W. Kelley and Marguerite L. Sanford ("claimants") appeal pro se the district court's summary judgment in a forfeiture action entered against real property located at 4274 Alta Vista Drive, Riverside, California. Claimants, as lienholders on the defendant property, argue that forfeiture of the property is inappropriate because they are innocent owners and, alternatively, that the district court abused its discretion by denying their request for an extension of time to file their opposition to the summary judgment motion. We have jurisdiction under…