United States v. Luis Enrique Gallegos-Corrales

37 F.3d 1507 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis Enrique GALLEGOS-CORRALES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50596. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 4, 1994. Decided Oct. 7, 1994. Before: BROWNING, FARRIS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 * The evidence was sufficient to establish Gallegos-Corrales's connection to the drug conspiracy. Gallegos-Corrales carried a telephone pager and appeared at the convenience store shortly after Martines and Silva made telephone calls which were similar to those made to pagers. He spoke to Martines at the convenience store, appeared to receive directions, and then followed Martines and Silva to Chalet Street. He handed Martines a white plastic bag, which a rational jury could have inferred contained the black plastic bag of cocaine. He followed Silva and Martines to the hotel where the drug transaction was to take place. A loaded…