United States v. Alonzo Terrance White

Good Law
37 F.3d 1507·1994 WL 526040·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 36324
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 27, 199493-10749California418 words

Opinion

Opinion

37 F.3d 1507 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alonzo Terrance WHITE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-10749. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 20, 1994. * Decided Sept. 27, 1994. Before: HALL, WIGGINS, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Alonzo Terrance White appeals his conviction, which followed a conditional plea of guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 922 (g). White contends that a police officer tripped him, thus effecting an illegal detention. White argues that the district court's finding that White fell after colliding with the officer is clearly erroneous. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and we affirm. 3 We review de novo the denial of a motion to suppress evidence. United States v. Khan, 993 F.2d 1368, 1375 (9th Cir.1993). We review the district court's findings of fact for clear error. United States v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.