Jacob Ikperha Orhorhaghe v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
38 F.3d 488·94 Daily Journal DAR 14858·1994 WL 576017·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 29340·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8004
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 21, 199492-70791California10,098 words

Opinion

Opinion

Reinhardt, J.

This case concerns the application of the rule that evidence obtained as a result of an “egregious violation” of the Fourth Amendment must be suppressed in administrative proceedings. See Gonzalez-Rivera v. I.N.S., 22 F.3d 1441 (9th Cir.1994); Adamson v. C.I.R., 745 F.2d 541 (9th Cir.1984). Jacob Ikperha Orhorhaghe, a Nigerian citizen, petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals which ordered him deported for overstaying his visa. See 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (a)(2) (1988). He claims that the BIA erred in reversing the Immigration Judge’s decision to suppress a passport and Form 1-94 (Arrival/Departure Record) that were seized in an egregious violation of his rights. We agree. Accordingly, we grant the petition and reverse and remand.

I. Facts

In June of 1986, Michael Smirnoff, an investigator for the Immigration and Naturalization Service, received a call from a professional acquaintance, Karen Muth. Muth worked for the Bank of America, investigating credit card frauds. She had investigated a number of frauds perpetrated by Nigerian nationals, and she was “in the habit” of calling Smirnoff “everytime she [came] across a Nigerian-sounding name and asking…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.