Samuel S. Barlow, Ina Barlow, Luella Barlow, Diane Barlow, Vincen Barlow, and Helaman Barlow v. John A. Blackburn

Good Law
38 F.3d 1218·1994 WL 574142·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 36934
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 19, 199493-15222California2,651 words

Opinion

Opinion

38 F.3d 1218 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Samuel S. BARLOW, Ina Barlow, Luella Barlow, Diane Barlow, Vincen Barlow, and Helaman Barlow, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. John A. BLACKBURN, et al., Defendant-Appellees. No. 93-15222. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 7, 1994. Decided Oct. 19, 1994. 1 Before: PREGERSON, WIGGINS, Circuit Judges, and FONG, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Samuel Barlow and his three wives and two children appeal the district court's dismissal of their 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action against members and employees of the Arizona Law Enforcement Officer Advisory Council (ALEOAC). They also appeal the court's denial of their motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. We affirm the court's dismissal of the first amended complaint because we find Barlow abandoned his appeal as to this issue. We also affirm the court's denial of Barlow's motion to amend because the court properly ruled that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.