In Re Rosemary Shirley, Debtor. Rosemary Shirley v. Clinton Charles Myers, in Re Rosemary Shirley, Debtor. Rosemary Shirley v. Marvin E. Shirley, Clinton Charles Myers T.D. Service Company

Good Law
38 F.3d 1218·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 36926
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 11, 199493-15780California1,368 words

Opinion

Opinion

38 F.3d 1218 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re Rosemary SHIRLEY, Debtor. Rosemary SHIRLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Clinton Charles MYERS, Defendant-Appellee. In re Rosemary SHIRLEY, Debtor. Rosemary SHIRLEY, Appellant, v. Marvin E. SHIRLEY, Plaintiff-Appellee, Clinton Charles Myers; T.D. Service Company, et al. Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 93-15780, 93-15784. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 5, 1994. * Decided Oct. 11, 1994. Before: GOODWIN, O'SCANNLAIN, KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Rosemary Shirley appeals dismissal of her two bankruptcy court appeals in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California for failure to comply with non-jurisdictional rules. We affirm. I. 3 These issues result from two appeals of cases arising out of the foreclosure on land securing "the Myers Parties" for a loan to Rosemary Shirley and her ex-husband Marvin Shirley, both of whom had filed for separate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.