United States v. Christopher L. Clark

38 F.3d 1218 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher L. CLARK, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10464. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 12, 1994. Decided Oct. 11, 1994. 1 Before: FARRIS and BEEZER, Circuit Judges, and McLAUGHLIN, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Christopher L. Clark appeals the sentence imposed after he pleaded guilty pursuant to the terms of a written plea agreement wherein he waived his right to appeal the sentence. However, Clark contends the district court misapplied the Sentencing Guidelines. 4 The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3231 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We hold the waiver enforceable and affirm the sentence. 5 * We review de novo whether an appellant has waived his statutory right to appeal. United States v. Bolinger, 940 F.2d 478, 479 (9th Cir.1991). 6 Clark pleaded guilty to…