Rie Munoz and Rie Munoz, Ltd. v. Albuquerque A.R.T. Co.

38 F.3d 1218 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Rie MUNOZ and Rie Munoz, Ltd., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. ALBUQUERQUE A.R.T. CO., Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-35743. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 3, 1994. Decided Oct. 19, 1994. Before: LAY, TROTT, AND T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Albuquerque A.R.T. Co. ("A.R.T.") appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Rie Munoz and Rie Munoz, Ltd. on the claim of copyright infringement and the district court's order of permanent injunction. We affirm. 3 A grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo. Jesinger v. Nevada Fed. Credit Union, 24 F.3d 1127, 1130 (9th Cir.1994). The appellate court's review is governed by the same standard used by the trial court under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c). Id. The appellate court must determine, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, whether there are any genuine…