James A. Hendrix v. Leo Branton, Jr. Geraldine Branton, Individually and the Marital Community Thereof, and Interlit B.V.I. Limited, a British Virgin Island Corporation, James A. Hendrix v. Leo Branton, Jr. A Law Corporation, a California Law Corporation, and Geraldine Branton, Individually and the Marital Community Thereof Interlit B.V.I. Limited, a British Virgin Islands Corporation

Good Law
38 F.3d 1218·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 36924
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 18, 199494-35172California1,163 words

Opinion

Opinion

38 F.3d 1218 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. James A. HENDRIX, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leo BRANTON, Jr.; Geraldine Branton, individually and the marital community thereof; et al., Defendants, and Interlit B.V.I. Limited, a British Virgin Island Corporation, Defendant-Appellant. James A. HENDRIX, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leo BRANTON, Jr.; a Law Corporation, A California Law Corporation, Defendants-Appellants, and Geraldine Branton, individually and the marital community thereof; Interlit B.V.I. Limited, a British Virgin Islands Corporation, Defendants. Nos. 94-35172, 94-35264. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 4, 1994. Decided Oct. 18, 1994. Before: LAY, * TROTT, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 These are two consolidated interlocutory appeals. 1 In No. 94-35172, Interlit B.V.I. Limited, a British Virgin Island corporation ("Interlit") appeals the district court's denial of its motion to compel…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.