United States v. Josephine C. Valenzuela

Good Law
38 F.3d 1219·1994 WL 579482·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 36915
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 20, 199493-10719California660 words

Opinion

Opinion

38 F.3d 1219 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Josephine C. VALENZUELA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-10719. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 6, 1994. Decided Oct. 20, 1994. Before: SCHROEDER, FERGUSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Defendant Appellant Josephine C. Valenzuela, along with five others, was charged with conspiracy to possess marijuana with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 846 and for possession of marijuana with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 (a)(1). The five defendants other than Valenzuela pleaded guilty to some of the charges against them. Valenzuela pleaded not guilty and had a jury trial in which she was found guilty of both charges. Valenzuela appeals her convictions solely on the ground of insufficient evidence. We affirm the convictions. 3 In reviewing a challenge to the sufficiency of evidence,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.