United States v. Dennis Lee Curry, Aka: Dennis Curry

Good Law
38 F.3d 1219·1994 WL 577242·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 36909
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 18, 199493-50570California358 words

Opinion

Opinion

38 F.3d 1219 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dennis Lee CURRY, aka: Dennis Curry, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50570. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 12, 1994. Decided Oct. 18, 1994. Before: FEINBERG, * SCHROEDER, and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 1. The record does not support defendant's contention that the district court was motivated by racial animus when it removed two jurors who started quarreling during deliberations. To the contrary, the court scolded one of the jurors for displaying racial bias in the jury room, and specifically instructed the remaining jurors that racial prejudice could play no role in their evaluation of the evidence. The district court's decision to remove the two quarreling jurors was based solely on the need to maintain order and civility during the jury's deliberations, and thus did not constitute an abuse of discretion.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.