United States v. Bernard Vincent Montgomery

38 F.3d 1219 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bernard Vincent MONTGOMERY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-15528. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 17, 1994. * Decided Oct. 21, 1994. Before: BROWNING, FARRIS and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Federal prisoner Bernard V. Montgomery appeals pro se the district court's denial of his Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a) motion to correct an illegal sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute. Montgomery contends that the district court violated Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(c) by failing to inform him of the potential effect of a special parole term that was included as part of his sentence. 1 We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 . We review de novo, United States v. Roberts, 5 F.3d 365, 368 (9th Cir.1993), and affirm. 3 Before accepting a guilty plea, the district court must inform…