Shee Atika, Plaintiff-Counterclaim v. Sealaska Corp., Defendant-Counterclaimant Shee Atika, Plaintiff-Counterclaim v. Sealaska Corp., Defendant-Counterclaimant Atikon Forest Products, Inc. Silver Bay Logging, Incorporated, Defendants-Counterclaimants-Appellants

Good Law
39 F.3d 247·94 Daily Journal DAR 15635·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 30649·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8458
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 4, 199493-35187California1,232 words

Opinion

Opinion

39 F.3d 247 SHEE ATIKA, Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee, v. SEALASKA CORP., Defendant-Counterclaimant Plaintiff-Appellant. SHEE ATIKA, Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant, v. SEALASKA CORP., Defendant-Counterclaimant Plaintiff-Appellee, Atikon Forest Products, Inc.; Silver Bay Logging, Incorporated, Defendants-Counterclaimants-Appellants. Nos. 93-35187, 93-35258. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 2, 1994. Decided Nov. 4, 1994. Bruce N. Edwards, Sorenson & Edwards, Seattle, WA, for Shee Atika. Bruce R. Gagnon, Atkinson, Conway & Gagnon, Anchorage, AK, for Sealaska Corp. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska. Before: PREGERSON, CANBY, and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges. CANBY, Circuit Judge: 1 Sealaska Corp. appeals the district court's denial of its motion to enjoin Shee Atika, Inc. permanently from using Sealaska's rock, sand, and gravel without Sealaska's consent. Shee Atika cross appeals. We dismiss Shee Atika's cross appeal, and affirm the district court's order denying Sealaska's request for an injunction. BACKGROUND 2 Sealaska is a regional corporation, formed pursuant to the Alaska…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.