Cedric R. Allen v. Adrien Norman, William Bunnell

Good Law
39 F.3d 1186·1994 WL 621161·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 37769
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 8, 199493-16818California755 words

Opinion

Opinion

39 F.3d 1186 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Cedric R. ALLEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ADRIEN NORMAN, WILLIAM BUNNELL, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-16818. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 1, 1994. * Decided Nov. 8, 1994. Before: WRIGHT, BEEZER and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 California prisoner Cedric R. Allen sued two correctional officers and a prison warden under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 . He appeals a judgment on a jury verdict for defendants. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm. 1. Jury Verdict 3 We review jury verdicts for substantial evidence. Davis v. Mason County, 927 F.2d 1473, 1486 (9th Cir.1991). Allen asserted that the correctional officers used excessive force to take him to a holding cage, and then left him naked in the cage for hours, flooded his cell, ransacked his belongings and took his legal documents. Allen's inconsistent testimony was the only evidence supporting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.