Belec v. Amerco

39 F.3d 1186 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ron BELEC, Applicant in intervention--Appellant, v. AMERCO, a State of Nevada corporation; Jack MacDonald, Director of Amerco; Richard Herrera, Director of Amerco; Kenneth Carlson; Clinton Richards, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-16625. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 17, 1994. * Decided Oct. 31, 1994. Before: BROWNING, FARRIS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ron Belec appeals pro se the district court's denial of leave to file a quo warranto action against a Nevada corporation and some of its directors. We affirm. 3 Ordinarily, only the state attorney general may file a quo warranto action under Nev.Rev.Stat. Secs. 35.010-.270. State ex rel. Holland v. City of Reno, 262 P.2d 953, 954 (Nev.1953). An exception may be made if three criteria are met: (1) the action would provide the only possible basis for relief to the private plaintiff, (2) the attorney general has refused…