Aref v. Marder

39 F.3d 1186 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Khairy AREF, Dr.; Hilda Hertel; Shereef Aref; William Bigelson; Steven Hertel; Yasser Aref; Stuart Hertel; Stanley Hertel, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. John MARDER; James Natoli; Richard Nakamura; Robert Wolfe; Douglas Collodel; Bret Carter; Charles Hart; Thomas Watters; Victor Daniels; Mohamed Kamel; John Bentley; Mohammed Sakr; Mohamed Elabd; William Beirne; Law Firm of Kamel; Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles; International Chamber of Commerce; Hufstedler, Kaus & Ettinger, et al.; Norman Neste; Charles Crandall, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-55428. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 1, 1994. * Decided Nov. 8, 1994. Before: WRIGHT, BEEZER and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Appellants appeal pro se the dismissal with prejudice of their amended complaint. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm. 3 Khairy Aref filed…