John Brett Allen v. Mark A. Henry, Warden United States Bureau of Prisons

Good Law
39 F.3d 1186·1994 WL 590016·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 37754
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 27, 199494-55344California662 words

Opinion

Opinion

39 F.3d 1186 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. John Brett ALLEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Mark A. HENRY, Warden; United States Bureau of Prisons, Respondents-Appellees. No. 94-55344. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 17, 1994. * Decided Oct. 27, 1994. Before: BROWNING, FARRIS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 John Brett Allen, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241 habeas corpus petition. Allen contends that the district court erred by denying him good time credit. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2253 . We review de novo, Grady v. Crabtree, 958 F.2d 874, 874 (9th Cir.1992) (per curiam), and affirm. 3 Depending upon his length of sentence, a federal prisoner sentenced under pre-Guidelines law may be awarded good time credits ranging from five to ten days for each month served. Gubiensio-Ortiz v. Kanahele, 857 F.2d 1245, 1266-67 (9th Cir.1988), vacated on other grounds,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.