Robert Brigaerts v. Leonard Cardoza Board of Supervisors of San Mateo County County of San Mateo Dr. B. Gilbert

39 F.3d 1186 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert BRIGAERTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Leonard CARDOZA; Board of Supervisors of San Mateo County; County of San Mateo; Dr. B. Gilbert, Defendants-Appellees. No. 90-15145. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 17, 1994. * Decided Oct. 31, 1994. Before: BROWNING, FARRIS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Robert Brigaerts, a pretrial detainee, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for defendants in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to his medical needs and denial of access to the courts. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , 1 and we reverse and remand. 3 A district court must provide a pro se prisoner litigant with fair notice of the requirements of Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 before entering summary judgment against him. Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409, 411-12 (9th Cir.1988). The relative intelligence and legal sophistication of…