Gregory Bryant v. E.R. Myers, Warden

39 F.3d 1186 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Gregory BRYANT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. E.R. MYERS, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 94-15684. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 1, 1994. * Decided Nov. 8, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, GOODWIN and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Gregory Bryant, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his habeas corpus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 . Bryant contends that the California court's retroactive application of a judicial decision violated his due process rights under the Ex Post Facto Clause and the Equal Protection Clause. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Secs. 2253 and 1291 and review de novo a district court's habeas corpus decision. See Desire v. Attorney General of California, 969 F.2d 802, 804 (9th Cir.1992). We affirm. I. BACKGROUND 3 Following a series of burglaries from April to June 1986, Bryant was convicted of…