Edward C. Bollinger v. Manfred F. Maass, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary

39 F.3d 1186 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Edward C. BOLLINGER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Manfred F. MAASS, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, Respondent-Appellee. No. 94-35356. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 1, 1994. * Decided Nov. 8, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, GOODWIN and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Oregon state prisoner Edward C. Bollinger appeals the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 habeas petition challenging his conviction of first degree sodomy. Bollinger contends that his conviction violated his due process rights because the state court entered a judgment on stipulated facts and failed to advise Bollinger of the legal consequences of the stipulation. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2253 , and we affirm. 3 A conviction based on stipulated facts is valid only if the defendant knowingly and voluntarily agreed to the stipulation. Adams v. Peterson, 968 F.2d 835,…