George Greenwood v. E.R. Meyers, Warden Attorney General of California

39 F.3d 1187 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. George GREENWOOD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. E.R. MEYERS, Warden; Attorney General of California, Respondents-Appellees. No. 93-56705. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 17, 1994. * Decided Oct. 27, 1994. Before: BROWNING, FARRIS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 George Greenwood appeals pro se the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Greenwood, who is serving a sentence of life without possibility of parole in California for murder and robbery, argues that (1) there was insufficient evidence to establish that his conduct was the proximate cause of the victim's death; (2) the felony-murder rule did not apply to his crime; (3) he received ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel; and (4) he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2253 and affirm. 3 We review de novo the denial of habeas corpus relief. Sanders…