MJT, Inc. v. Adcom Exp., Inc.

Good Law
39 F.3d 1187·1994 WL 621992
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 4, 199493-15481California1,308 words

Opinion

Opinion

39 F.3d 1187 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. MJT, INC., a California corporation; Cyrus D. Fish, individually; Michael T. Talia, individually; Edward P. Kasper, individually; Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ADCOM EXPRESS, INC., a Minnesota corporation; Robert F. Friedman, individually; Commissioner of Corporation; and Does 1 through 25, inclusive, Defendants-Appellees No. 93-15481. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 14, 1994. 1 Decided Nov. 4, 1994. 1 Before: CHOY and NOONAN, Circuit Judges, and MARQUEZ 2 2 MEMORANDUM * 3 Plaintiffs MJT, Inc., Cyrus D. Fish, Michael T. Talia, and Edward P. Kasper (collectively "MJT"), appeal the United States District Court's Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) dismissal of its action against defendants Adcom Express, Inc., a Minnesota corporation and Robert F. Friedman, the majority shareholder of Adcom (collectively "Adcom"). The District Court held that because a concurrent action involving…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.