Steven L. Knight v. State of Arizona, Stephen J. Parsons v. Samuel A. Lewis

39 F.3d 1187 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Steven L. KNIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF ARIZONA, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Stephen J. PARSONS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Samuel A. LEWIS, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 94-15485, 94-15492. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 1, 1994. * Decided Nov. 8, 1994. Before: WRIGHT, BEEZER and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Arizona state prisoners Knight and Parsons appeal pro se the district court's summary judgment dismissal of their 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. They claimed prison officials denied them wages and education/rehabilitation in violation of their due process and equal protection rights. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm. A. Standing 3 We review standing de novo. Crow Tribe of Indians v. Campbell Farming Corp., 31 F.3d 768, 769 (9th Cir.1994). Plaintiffs have standing because they allege an injury--the denial of wages, education and…