Joseph Lee Hutchison v. O. Ivan White, Warden

Good Law
39 F.3d 1187·1994 WL 590068·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 37779
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 27, 199494-15296California831 words

Opinion

Opinion

39 F.3d 1187 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Joseph Lee HUTCHISON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. O. Ivan WHITE, Warden; et al., Respondents-Appellees. No. 94-15296. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 17, 1994. * Decided Oct. 27, 1994. Before: BROWNING, FARRIS, LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Joseph Lee Hutchison, a former federal prisoner, 1 appeals the district court's denial of his habeas corpus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241 . 2 We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2253 and review de novo the district court's denial of a habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241 . Smith v. United States Parole Comm'n, 875 F.2d 1361, 1363 (9th Cir.1989). We affirm. 3 While on state parole, Hutchison was arrested for a federal crime but subsequently escaped. Upon recapture, he was held as a federal prisoner at a county facility in Kentucky. Shortly after Hutchison's recapture, the Kentucky Parole Board issued a parole…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.