Linick v. District Court of State of Or. for County of Lane

39 F.3d 1187 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Michael D. LINICK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The DISTRICT COURT OF the STATE OF OREGON FOR the COUNTY OF LANE; Ann Aiken, Lane County District Judge; Frank R. Alderson, District Court Judge; Bryan T. Hodges, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-35121. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 13, 1994. Decided Oct. 28, 1994. Before: ALDISERT, * NORRIS and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** OVERVIEW 2 Pursuant to Oregon Revised Statutes 151.430 et seq, Oregon's state court administrator has promulgated standards and procedures for appointing counsel to represent indigent criminal defendants at state expense. The standards instruct the Oregon courts to compile lists of eligible attorneys and to appoint counsel from those lists whenever a public defender or other contract attorney is not selected. The standards also establish objective qualification criteria for lawyers…