Miller v. Kaminski

39 F.3d 1187 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Mark MILLER, Linda A. Miller, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Paul J. KAMINSKI, M.D., Radiation Therapy Medical Group, Southwest Medical Physics Associates, Does 1 To 80, Defendants, Atomic Energy, Ltd., A.E.C.L. Medical Company, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-55412. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 6, 1994 * Decided Nov. 1, 1994. 1 Before: FLETCHER, BOOCHEVER, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Plaintiffs Mark and Linda Miller appeal the district court's summary judgment for the defendant Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (A.E.C.L.). The Millers argue that the district court erred by finding that their claim was barred by California's one-year statute of limitations for products liability claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2107 , and we affirm. 4 We review de novo the district court's grant of summary judgment. Jones v. Union Pac. R.R., 968 F.2d 937, 940 (9th…